Hawai’i

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. News, and Other Relevant Links
  3. Related Organizations and Resources
  4. Featured Resolutions
  5. Timeline: Hawai‘i County Nuclear Legislation
Written By

Nalani Saito


Hawai‘i –– in particular the “Big Island” and O‘ahu –– has a decades-long history of local action against nuclear weapons in the Pacific.

Since 1893, when the U.S. forcibly annexed Hawai‘i, the islands have been increasingly militarized. Given its location in the Pacific Ocean, the U.S. military has strategized Hawai‘i as the “Bridge to Asia.” Since the end of World War II, Hawai‘i’s military units have been tasked with many roles, including: defending the islands from air, sea, and “amphibious” attack; “denying the mid-Pacific to any hostile power”; and being prepared for wartime expansion, transit, and mounting to deploy troops to “any location in the Pacific within ninety days from the ‘date of warning’ order.” 

The U.S. military controlled 221,981 acres of Hawai’i’s land as of 2021. This includes trust lands — Native Hawaiian land controlled by the state that cannot be freely sold or developed without restrictions — leased to the U.S. military for 65 years at the cost of $1, which begin expiring in 2029. Additionally, tens of thousands of military personnel from around the world are brought to Hawai‘i for various “exercises,” most famously RIMPAC, held on O‘ahu and the Big Island every two years.

Community members and activists have questioned military land-stewardship, citing examples such as the Big Island’s Pōhakuloa Training Area (PTA), which is part of a land lease expiring in 2029, the renewal of which conservationists are advocating against. The training exercises conducted at Pōhakuloa have introduced toxic materials, including depleted uranium, into the environment. 


Additional examples include Kaho‘olawe, a Hawaiian island the U.S. military used as bombing target practice from 1941 until 1990. While activists with the Protect Kaho‘olawe ‘Ohana succeeded in returning Kaho‘olawe to the state in 1994 after nearly twenty years of protest and actions, restoration of the land remains unfinished to this day.

History of Anti-Nuclear Activism

Much of Hawai‘i’s engagement with nuclear disarmament has centered on issues of militarism broadly, as well as land and ocean-based environmental protection. These engagements have taken the form of activism, organizing, and civic participation, including the Golden Rule’s voyage in 1958, anti-nuclear legislation adopted on the “Big Island” in the 1980s and 2020s, and the Nuclear Free Pacific Conference held in Hawai‘i in 1980. 

Golden Rule Project – O‘ahu

The Golden Rule was a two-masted boat sailed by peace activists in 1958 to protest nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands. The crew was affiliated with the Committee for Nonviolent Action, an antiwar group, and in alignment with the nonviolent ethics behind the voyage, two of the four members were Quaker. The crew aimed the voyage towards Bikini Atoll, but before they could reach their destination, the U.S. Coast Guard apprehended them near Hawai‘i. The members were arrested and incarcerated in Honolulu, sparking protests on the U.S. continent, igniting other waterborne protests, and drawing global attention to the issue of nuclear testing.

Today, the Golden Rule is operated by Veterans for Peace, who restored the vessel to complete anti-nuclear voyages around the world.

The Nuclear-Free and Independent Pacific Movement 

The Nuclear-Free and Independent Pacific (NFIP) movement began in conjunction with independence movements in the Pacific during the 1970s. The NFIP movement, in resistance to nuclear colonialism, began organizing indigenous Pacific peoples and nations. At the fourth Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific Movement Conference 1983 in Vanuatu, attendees ratified The Peoples’ Charter for a Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific, which denounced colonial and imperialist control of these peoples and their land. 

Kānaka Maoli (Native Hawaiians) were central to the movement in several ways. Their involvement included attending nuclear-free conferences, hosting the third NFIP conference in Honolulu in 1980, and contributing to literature and media about these issues, such as Pacific Women Speak Out
Since the height of the NFIP movement, there have been several organizations, collectives, and groups promoting anti-nuclearism in Hawai‘i. These include Veterans for Peace chapter 113, International Women’s Network Against Militarism affiliate Women’s Voices Women Speak (WVWS), and DMZ Hawai‘i/Aloha ‘Aina. Activists, scholars, and leaders are still seeking nuclear freedom and justice, questioning the role of allyship and solidarity movements in working toward anti-militarism.

In the State of Hawai‘i, there are five counties: Hawai‘i County, Honolulu County, Kalawao County, Kauai County, and Maui County. Of these five, three counties have passed legislation related to nuclear topics –– Hawai‘i, Honolulu, and Maui. Hawai‘i County covers Hawai‘i island (the “Big Island). Honolulu County covers the urban area of Honolulu, the rest of the island of O‘ahu, and the minor northwestern Hawaiian islands, except Midway Atoll. Maui County covers the islands of Maui, Lānaʻi, Molokaʻi, Kahoʻolawe, and Molokini. Hawai‘i County’s legislative body is the Hawai‘i County Council, Honolulu County’s legislative body is the Honolulu City Council, and Maui County’s legislative body is the Maui County Council. 

RESOLUTIONS

Maui County Council: Ordinance No. 1377, Bill No. 15

MARCH 12, 1986

This bill coinciding with Ordinance No. 1377 sought to amend Title 19 of Maui County Code by the addition of a new chapter denying “land use to nuclear reactors, nuclear weapons, and all research and testing facilities” on land or water. The ordinance was passed by the full council on March 2, 1984 but later vetoed by Mayor Hannibal Tavares on March 12 that same year. Despite the veto, the council pushed the ordinance through on April 6, 1984.

RESOLUTIONS

Honolulu City Council: Resolution No. 19-262

OCTOBER 11, 2019

Honolulu’s Resolution No. 19-262 is entitled “Supporting the United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and Welcoming the Golden Rule Peace Boat to Hawaii.” It expresses explicit support for the TPNW, ICAN, and the Golden Rule. The resolution describes the U.S. and Russia’s disproportionate ownership of nuclear warheads and the immense associated risks. It also outlines the history of the Golden Rule protests in helping to pass the Limited Nuclear Ban Treaty of 1963. 

This resolution was originally discussed and approved by the Committee on Business, Economic Development and Tourism on Oct. 22, 2019. It reached full Honolulu City Council on November 6, 2019.

Helen Jaccard submitted an early, written testimony and spoke before the council. As a member of Veterans for Peace, Jaccard discussed the Golden Rule Project’s historic voyage and referenced its return trip in 2019 to Honolulu, citing VFP’s participation in the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). Jaccard called on Council to pass the resolution to (a.) align with other cities and states that have passed resolutions and (b.) urge the U.S. to ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). Read Jaccard’s full statement here.

Colonel (Ret) Ann Wright submitted an early, written testimony. As a member of Veterans for Peace (VFP) Chapter 113-Hawaii, part of the Advisory Council for VFP International, a retired U.S. Army Colonel, and a former U.S. diplomat, Wright expressed “strong support” for this resolution. Wright discussed the Golden Rule Project’s historic voyage and referenced its return trip in 2019 to Honolulu, as well as the state of Hawai‘i’s welcome resolution to the Golden Rule. Wright called on Council to pass the resolution to join other city councils that have passed resolutions to support the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). Wright concluded writing “I recognize that this type of resolution concerning nuclear disarmament is very controversial in the militarized State of Hawaii, but I hope this proposal will advance discussion of the horrific realities of nuclear war.” Read Wright’s full statement here.
Pete Doktor submitted a written testimony. As a former Army medic, Doktor expressed support for denuclearization and disarmament because “nuclear weapons have not served public safety or health, nor do they bring genuine human security.” Doktor also named concerns as a resident of Hawai‘i and history teacher about the presence of military bases such as Pearl Harbor, built on Pu‘uloa, in attracting conflict to Hawai‘i. Doktor concluded by praising the Golden Rule and encouraging further education on topics such as war. Read Doktor’s full statement here.

All early testimonies can be viewed here.

All additional testimonies can be viewed here.